About

 

About BINZ

Te Utu Tika Hei Oranga i Aotearoa – Basic Income New Zealand Inc. (BINZ) was formed in May 2015 to promote Basic Income (BI) in New Zealand.

.

New Constitution 2026

Our constitution is being revised.

Read our new 2026 Constitution

The 2026 constitution is yet to receive formal approval.

.

What is a Basic Income?

The Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN) defines a Basic Income as:

A Basic Income is a periodic cash payment unconditionally delivered to all on an individual basis, without means test or work requirement.

A Basic Income is granted unconditionally to all citizens or permanent residents, as individuals, without distinctions, means-test, or work requirements.

Cash payment includes payment into personal bank accounts.

How often is a Basic Income paid?

The standard definition of a Basic Income says only that it is a periodic payment. This means it might be paid weekly, fortnightly, monthly or perhaps annually.

However, low-income individuals often face financial difficulties with less frequent payments, so more frequent payments, such as weekly, are desirable.

Is a Basic Income taxable?

The internationally agreed definition of a Basic Income does not say whether a Basic Income should be paid as a taxable or tax-free amount.

  • This allows flexibility in the design of Basic Income schemes.

However, paying a Basic Income as a taxable amount allows:

Improved targeting of the Basic Income to those on lower incomes.

People with low and high incomes are paid the same gross Basic Income amount, but with a progressive tax, those with lower incomes receive a greater net amount after tax is deducted. This provides Broad Targeting to those on lower incomes.

Lower overall cost and easier implementation of a Basic Income scheme when paid with a suitable tax scheme.

A taxable Basic Income with a progressive tax system, which pays a dollar in net value to someone with no other income, will pay less than a dollar in net value to someone with a high income.

  • Consequently, a scheme with a taxable Basic Income will have a total net cost that is less than a tax-free Basic Income, which delivers a net dollar to everyone equally, regardless of other income.
  • The lower overall cost of a taxable Basic Income scheme makes it easier for a government to implement a Basic Income scheme.

For further details, see our pages:

In summary, a taxable Basic Income reduces the overall cost of a scheme by broadly targeting the Basic Income to those in need, making it easier for a government to start and maintain a Basic Income scheme.

Basic Income and Welfare
  • A Basic Income replaces all welfare payments of the same or less value and partially replaces larger payments.
  • People with special needs will receive the Basic Income and top-up payments to maintain their current welfare income levels.

In summary, a Basic Income is a payment that is substantial enough to be worthwhile while small enough to be affordable, which is topped up to current welfare payment levels for those with special needs.

A good Basic Income will be indexed with inflation to automatically maintain its value.

.

Alternative descriptions of a Basic Income

What is a realistic Basic Income?

A realistic Basic Income is a Basic Income that is large enough to be worthwhile and small enough to be practical.

  • Such a Basic Income is likely to have annual net or after-tax payments for each recipient in the range of 20% to 30% of GDP per capita.
    • A Basic Income in the range of 20% to 30% of GDP per capita is known to be economically feasible.
    • A Basic Income will complement, not replace, universal services such as free education and free hospital care.
    • If universal basic services are reduced or eliminated, a Basic Income must be larger to compensate, and a lower level of targeting to those in need will be achieved.
  • A realistic Basic Income may also be described as a feasible, viable, possible, practical, pragmatic or workable Basic Income.
  • A realistic Basic Income allows top-ups for those with special needs.
  • A realistic Basic Income is paid in conjunction with a tax system that enables broad targeting of a Basic Income to those with the greatest need.
    • This will maximise the benefits for those with the greatest need while minimising the overall cost of the Basic Income.
    • For further details, see Targeting and Taxation.
  • A Basic Income will boost GDP per capita. Consequently, a Basic Income set as a percentage of GDP per capita will increase in real value as the GDP per capita rises. For further details, see Frequently Asked Questions.

On this website, the words “Basic Income” will refer to a realistic Basic Income, a Basic Income that can be achieved.

What is a full Basic Income?

The term, a “full Basic Income” is sometimes used in some countries. However, a “full Basic Income” is ambiguous and its use is not recommended. To some, it refers to a Basic Income that replaces all welfare, while to others it refers to a Basic Income that will replace all government services as well as welfare.

A “full Basic Income” is sometimes used to describe a Basic Income that is large enough to replace all current welfare payments, or a combination of payments, received by any single individual, without a loss of income for the individual or need to top up payments to current welfare income levels.

Such a payment has limitations.

  • As people with special needs sometimes receive significant welfare payments, paying everyone the same will incur a very high cost that will be too large to fund and implement in practice.
  • Paying everyone the same large amount will destroy existing relativities where people with greater needs receive more.
    • This could result in significant opposition from individuals who are opposed to this loss of relativity.
  • Paying those with large incomes a substantial amount as a Basic Income will be more difficult to fund with a progressive income tax or any other tax scheme, and may unduly reward those with high incomes.
  • The large size of a full Basic Income is likely to result in an unrealistically expensive Basic Income scheme – one which cannot be achieved in practice.

If a full Basic Income were to replace government services as well as all welfare, it would need to be even greater in value and even more difficult to fund.

Basic Income experts usually regard a “full Basic Income” as impractical due to the very high costs and the resulting undesirable loss of relatives.

What is a partial Basic Income?

The phrase “partial Basic Income” is sometimes used to describe a Basic Income that is large enough to replace some but not all welfare payments.

  • For example, if a Basic Income is the size of the adult Jobseeker Support payment, it will replace welfare payments of the same size or smaller, but top-ups or additional payments will be required to bring some people’s income up to their current welfare levels.

As a partial Basic Income meets the international BIEN definition of a “Basic Income”, the words “Basic Income” will be used here.

A Basic Income sets a minimum income floor rather than setting a single income level that is large enough to replace all welfare payments, and perhaps replace government services as well, or large enough to provide a living income.

.

What is a UBI?

The use of “UBI”, is ambiguous as it may alternatively refer to a:

  • Universal Basic Income
  • Unconditional Basic Income
  • Uniform Basic Income
  • Unrealistic Basic Income
  • Unrealisable Basic Income
  • Unsuitable Basic Income
  • Unnecessary Basic Income

The degree of ambiguity is itself a good reason for not referring to a “UBI”.

UBI is also used by some people to refer to a Basic Income that is large enough to replace all welfare payments with a single level payment without the need for top-ups for those with special or additional needs.

  • To avoid income cuts for some welfare recipients with high needs, such a payment must be as large as their current total payments.
  • Set at this high level, the total cost of a Basic Income scheme will be so large as to make the Basic Income scheme impractical or unrealisable.
  • Alternatively, some argue for a Universal Basic Income with a payment level calculated by taking the total current welfare payments and dividing them by the number of people in the eligible age range, with no top-up for those with special needs.
    • Such a payment will result in significant income cuts for some welfare recipients who have a real need for higher payments, and give money equally to those with very high incomes and no need for any extra income.

A Basic Income, as defined by the international definition, is both universal and unconditional for all people within the defined group, with top-ups available for those with special needs.

A Basic Income with top-ups is a feasible proposition and will not result in income cuts for welfare recipients with high needs.

Consequently, a “Basic Income” with top-ups is preferable to discussing he ambiguous UBIs referred to above.

People who talk of a UBI as an amount determined by taking the sum of all current welfare payments and dividing that amount equally amongst the population to determine the value of a “UBI” paid equally to all citizens to replace all welfare, without top-ups, are seen as naive, as this will cause hardship for some, and provide unnecessary additional income to others.

Rutger Bregman asks, Don’t believe in a universal basic income? This is why it would work, and how we can pay for it. World Economic Forum. 2018.

.

Vision, Aim, and Principles

BINZ will promote a Basic Income for New Zealand, that is, regular payments given unconditionally to all on an individual basis, without means test or work requirements.

Further details
  • BINZ focuses on practical ways of transitioning to a Basic Income, of financing it and operating it.
  • BINZ has no political alliances or biases.
  • BINZ welcomes all proposals for the practical implementation of a realistic Basic Income.

.

Guidelines

Basic Income New Zealand applies guidelines for a well-designed Basic Income that complies with the principles of fairness and justice:

Read the guidelines
  • A Basic Income is both universal and unconditional, with the level based solely on age in broad bands, or in some cases on special needs.
    • For example, one rate for children, one for those of working age, and one for superannuants.
    • Special rates may be considered for those with ongoing special needs, or alternatively,
    • Those with special needs will receive top-ups to ensure that they receive current levels of income.
  • Universal and conditional means that a Basic Income is paid to all eligible people, with no restrictions placed on the payment of the Basic Income or the use of the money after payment.
    • A Basic Income is usually paid into a personal bank account, without restrictions on the use of the money.
    • No time restrictions are placed on the use of the money, allowing people on low incomes and others to save money for future use.
  • A Basic Income scheme is as simple as possible.
  • The method of funding a Basic Income is as simple as possible.
  • A Basic Income scheme is as fair as possible.
  • A Basic Income does not preclude the payment of other allowances for hardship or exceptional circumstances.
  • A Basic Income scheme does not reduce the incomes of those who are at present on legitimate and justifiable welfare.
  • The payment structure and funding method of Basic Income do not increase inequality.
  • A Basic Income does not worsen other social problems.
  • A Basic Income sets no conditions on entitlement apart from citizenship, permanent residency, or work permits if or when required.
  • A Basic Income may be a taxable or tax-free payment depending on the design of the scheme. Taxable schemes with Broad Targeting are preferable.
  • The receipt of a Basic Income may be coupled to an appropriate income tax scheme to ensure Broad Targeting of the Basic Income to those with low to mid-range incomes.
    • A taxable Basic Income paid in conjunction with a suitable progressive tax scheme provides the best targeting of payments to those on lower incomes and will lower the cost of the Basic Income scheme. 
    • Targeting a Basic Income with an appropriate progressive tax lowers the cost of a Basic Income scheme and makes the introduction of a scheme feasible.
  • The design of the Basic Income scheme shall not increase inequality by targeting payments to or unduly rewarding those who have no need of additional income.
  • A Basic Income should be large enough to be meaningful and small enough to be feasible – probably in the range of 20% to 30% of GDP per capita.
  • A Basic Income of the same or similar value as the current Jobseeker Support payments will meet these guidelines and is supported by most Basic Income advocates.
  • A Basic Income will be automatically increased in value in line with inflation to ensure that its value is maintained.
Capitalisation

On this website, the words Basic Income will be capitalised to indicate a Basic Income that conforms to the BIEN definition and the guidelines above.

Introducing and funding a realistic Basic Income

Here are some quick guidelines on introducing and funding a good Basic Income scheme.

  1. Minimise the initial cost
    To achieve a Basic Income, the payments must be of a realistic size, replace existing payments wherever possible, and be broadly targeted to those on low incomes.

    Minimising the initial costs makes it easier to introduce a comprehensive Basic Income Scheme.
    .
    To achieve this:
    • The net value of a realistic Basic Income is between 20% and 30% of GDP per capita.
    • A Basic Income will replace all welfare payments of equal or less value and partially replace larger payments.
    • A Basic Income will be taxable to enable Broad Targeting of the Basic Income to those on lower incomes, maximising the use of money.
    • Minimising the initial or up-front costs this way makes it easier to introduce and fund a Basic Income.
      .
  2. The Multiplier Effect will boost government revenues.
    People on lower incomes need to spend money on essentials like food and housing, so they tend to spend money quickly. In contrast, those with higher incomes tend to accumulate money and spend it slowly.
    • This means that those on lower incomes have a higher Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
    • Those with a higher MPC spend their money quickly, which boosts the velocity of money in their local area.
    • When a Basic Income is paid to all and Broadly Targeted to those on lower Incomes with a suitable tax regime, the velocity of money rises nationally.
    • When the velocity of money rises, there is an increase in the multiplier effect, the factor by which GDP rises when compared with an initial injection of money. Just as the velocity of money rises both locally and nationally, increases in the multiplier effect occur both locally and nationally. This has been observed with Basic Income trials.
    • Increases in GDP due to the Multiplier Effect increase government tax revenues, which can be used to fund the Basic Income.
    • Realising that increases in government revenue are a result of the initial Basic Income expenditure enables the real cost of a Basic Income to be more accurately determined.
      .
  3. Calculate the real cost of a Basic Income
    The real cost of an ongoing Basic Income Scheme is the money that must be found from elsewhere to fund the scheme.
    • When a taxable Basic Income is paid out and spent, a portion of the money will be returned to the government in income taxes by the recipients, and a further amount will be returned as GST on goods and services they purchase.
    • As the money continues to circulate, a similar portion is returned with each circulation. Eventually, almost all the money from any one payment is returned as taxes.
    • Once introduced, the money being returned per period will rise to almost the same level as the total amount being paid out for that period.
    • Because most of the money paid out with a well-designed Basic Income scheme will circulate and return to the government over time as taxes, the ongoing real cost of a good scheme is minimal.
    • By minimising the initial gross expenditure and considering the net cost of a Basic Income, while accounting for the multiplier effect, and return of funds as taxes, the real cost of a Basic Income is found to be considerably less than the figure obtained by multiplying the gross payment by the number of recipients.

      A cost determined by multiplying the gross cost per person by the number of recipients is a false and grossly misleading cost, and is only used by those with little or no understanding of reality.

      More details on the above and funding a Basic Income are found elsewhere on this website.

.

The BINZ Constitution

The Constitution (pdf, 36kB) describes our aims, structure, and rules.

For enquiries regarding the Constitution, please contact the Secretary.

Establishment

BINZ was established following Professor Guy Standing’s lectures on “The Precariat” and “A Precariat Charter” during a Humanist and Rationalist conference held in Havelock North. 

  • Professor Standing is a founding member of the Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN), an international organisation established in 1986 with the aim of linking individuals and groups interested in the Basic Income concept.

.

.

260302

Previous: 260223, 251129, 251026-9, 251020, 251014, 250930, 250920, 250816, 250722, 250606, 250317; 221019

.